<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Orders Release of Sealed Rosenberg Grand Jury Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historycoalition.org/2008/07/25/court-orders-release-of-sealed-rosenberg-grand-jury-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historycoalition.org/2008/07/25/court-orders-release-of-sealed-rosenberg-grand-jury-records/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Junod</title>
		<link>http://historycoalition.org/2008/07/25/court-orders-release-of-sealed-rosenberg-grand-jury-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Junod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historycoalition.org/?p=417#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>Although I am no expert in this field, I would simply note that while I was touring the Spy Museum in Washington D.C., there was an exibit which seems to have left no room for doubt in this case.   It surprised me because I thought the issue as to their guilt or innocence was still in dispute among scholars -- or at least it was when I received my Ph.D.   It was two pieces of a Jello box that was supposedly used to identify &quot;contacts.&quot;

Does anyone have a more in-depth perspective on this.   I was concerned at the time that the secret agencies had more access to information on this case than scholars, but I could easily be mistaken in that view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am no expert in this field, I would simply note that while I was touring the Spy Museum in Washington D.C., there was an exibit which seems to have left no room for doubt in this case.   It surprised me because I thought the issue as to their guilt or innocence was still in dispute among scholars &#8212; or at least it was when I received my Ph.D.   It was two pieces of a Jello box that was supposedly used to identify &#8220;contacts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does anyone have a more in-depth perspective on this.   I was concerned at the time that the secret agencies had more access to information on this case than scholars, but I could easily be mistaken in that view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

