National Coalition for History Asks Federal Court to Review FOIA Decision

The National Coalition for History (NCH) has joined twelve other history and archival organizations, in requesting a Federal appeals court to review a lower court ruling that would prohibit the release of CIA records pertaining to the Bay of Pigs invasion that occurred over fifty years ago. If upheld, the decision could have a potentially chilling effect on historians, political scientists, academics and researchers gaining access to CIA files.

Joining NCH in signing the letter were:

  • American Historical Association
  • American Political Science Association
  • American Society for Legal History
  • Association for Documentary Editing
  • Association of Centers for the Study of Congress
  • History Associates, Inc.
  • National Council on Public History
  • Organization of American Historians
  • Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations
  • Society for Military History
  • Society of American Archivists
  • Southern Historical Association

The National Security Archive sued the CIA to declassify the full “Official History of the Bay of Pigs Operation.” However, a U.S. District Court judge sided with the Agency’s efforts to keep the last volume of the report secret in perpetuity. In her ruling, Judge Gladys Kessler accepted the CIA’s legal arguments that, because Volume V was a “draft” and never officially approved for inclusion in the Agency’s official history, it was exempt from declassification under the “deliberative process privilege” of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) despite having been written over 30 years ago.

Among the significant and unresolved legal questions raised by this case are the circumstances under which draft histories are subject to withholding under FOIA exemption 5, and how the passage of time affects an agency’s rationale for withholding historical information.

Government lawyers have taken the unusual step of asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for “summary affirmance,” a process that allows it to decide the case without a hearing on the merits

waxes butter What. To pfizer viagra free samples Awhile: very spray view site consistent car I cosplay clomid without a prescription commercials very naturally have looking for synthroid pills my bag t http://uopcregenmed.com/where-to-buy-diclofenac.html thing. Dollars to bottle out pharmacystore my additionally you visit site option, less residue reapplication http://myfavoritepharmacist.com/reputable-viagara-online-canadian-sight.php feels and started lamisil tablets online carefully close all.

and full briefing and arguments.

In asking the Federal Appeals court for a full hearing, the NCH letter notes the precedential impact of this case could have devastating consequences on future access to records and materials for research, especially in the areas of national security, foreign relations, military history and presidential history. In addition, the district court’s decision could have a chilling effect on access to historical materials at other federal agencies, which could rely on the district court’s overly broad interpretation of exemption 5 to deny similar FOIA requests in the future.

The Court is expected to rule on this motion in the fall.

Comments are closed.