On July 22, 2008, a federal court in New York decided that the government must release most of the sealed grand jury records from the 1951 indictment of alleged Soviet spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. The petitioners include the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the National Security Archive at George Washington University, the Organization of American Historians, the Society of American Archivists, and New York Times reporter Sam Roberts.
In response to a petition filed by the plaintiffs, the government conceded in a June filing that the Rosenberg case is of “significant historical importance” and therefore said it would not contest the release of testimony of witnesses who have passed away or consented to the disclosure. On the basis of the government’s concession, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York said he will order release of the testimony of 36 witnesses.
Judge Hellerstein reserved ruling on three additional witnesses that appear to be deceased and four witnesses that the government said it could not locate, and ordered the government to make greater efforts to confirm the status of these witnesses.
With regard to several living witnesses that objected to release of their testimony, including David Greenglass, Ethel Rosenberg’s brother, Judge Hellerstein said he would deny the petition for release and allow these materials to remain secret. Finally, he suggested that grand jury materials from the related proceeding against Abraham Brothman and Miriam Moskowitz should be released, but said he will wait to rule until the government determines whether the witnesses are dead or consent to release.
In a brief filed last week, petitioners argued that David Greenglass’ testimony should be released, despite the fact that Greenglass did not consent, because he has waived his privacy interest by discussing the case with numerous historians and journalists and has admitted to giving false testimony about the role of Ethel Rosenberg in the alleged spy ring.
The petitioners’ brief and supporting declarations also presented evidence that several of the witnesses that the government could not locate—including Perry Alexander Seay, William Perl, and Michael Sidorovich—have passed away and therefore their testimony should be released. Petitioners further challenged the government’s assertion that the material from the Brothman-Moskowitz grand jury should not be released, arguing that prosecution “is especially significant to understanding the Rosenberg-Sobell case because of the interlocking nature of the two prosecutions” and because of the critical testimony of two high-profile witnesses, Harry Gold and Elizabeth Bentley, who did not appear before the Rosenberg grand jury but whose testimony was important in both trials.
“For historians, the Rosenberg grand jury records represent the last piece in the puzzle of what FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover called ‘the case of the Century,’” explained the Archive’s Director, Tom Blanton. “The government’s concessions establish a strong precedent that even in traditionally secret areas of government activity, like a grand jury, the public still has an interest and the records still belong to the public.”
One thought on “Court Orders Release of Sealed Rosenberg Grand Jury Records”
Although I am no expert in this field, I would simply note that while I was touring the Spy Museum in Washington D.C., there was an exibit which seems to have left no room for doubt in this case. It surprised me because I thought the issue as to their guilt or innocence was still in dispute among scholars — or at least it was when I received my Ph.D. It was two pieces of a Jello box that was supposedly used to identify “contacts.”
Does anyone have a more in-depth perspective on this. I was concerned at the time that the secret agencies had more access to information on this case than scholars, but I could easily be mistaken in that view.
Comments are closed.